« Microsoft’s attempt to commoditize virtualization | Main | Don’t believe any statistics you don’t make up yourself »

January 11, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a01156f01861f970c0120a7c3adba970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference VMware and Citrix both seek to upgrade XenApp customers to VDI:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

John Coleman

If a customer wants to dump Citrix for VMware View, let them. I tried it and it failed big time. I almost got fired. Now I've got Xendesktop in place with Xenapp and finally have an environment that works.

Steve Kaplan

John,

I haven't personally been involved with a XenDesktop deployment, though I've heard very good things about it. I have been involved with several very successful View engagements. Whether XenApp or View, however, a successful virtual desktop migration necessitates a lot of planning, testing & piloting. It's relatively a no-brainer to virtualize 100 physical servers to 6 virtualization hosts - users aren't affected except that they might notice improved performance, no more hardware maintenance windows, etc. The desktop side, though, is very different. VDI, whether VMware or Citrix, is not only very technically demanding - but should include social engineering in terms of user expectations and education.

Jim

Does this offer include the $110 per user per year VECD tax on VDI from MS? Is this vendor subsidizing that in the $75 per user "upgrade" offer? How do they manage the shift from concurrent to the VDI per-device licensing of VECD?

Steve Kaplan

Jim, Unfortunately, neither the AltTech Trade-in or Citrix Trade-up programs include Microsoft VECD licensing. The AltTech program is on a concurrent basis, so nothing changes when upgrading from XenApp. The Citrix program, I would assume, simply means that you make a choice when migrating XenApp concurrent licenses to be licensed for XenDesktop either by user or by device.

Steven Hunt

That is correct Steve.

The comments to this entry are closed.